JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 9, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Marco Tulio Restrepo

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Fallo De Tutela
  • Nulidad implica remisión al juez competente para trámite de demanda
  • Envío oportuno para revisión
Revision Eventual Fallo De Tutela
  • Remisión a Sala de Selección
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se determinó que en el presente asunto no hay conflicto de competencia, toda vez que en realidad no se trata de una colisión de competencias porque ésta no se ha suscitado entre los Jueces de la referencia.

Se trata de un fallo de tutela que como toda sentencia de tutela está sujeta a su eventual revisión.

En el presente caso hubo un fallo en primera instancia.

Necesariamente tenía que haberse dictado la sentencia de fondo porque en la tutela no tienen cabida las sentencias inhibitorias.

En consecuencia, se ordenó remitir el expediente de la tutela instaurada a la respectiva Sala de Selección para que sea allí donde se determine si se escoge o no para revisión.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DETERMINAR que en el presente asunto no hay conflicto de competencia.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR el expediente que contiene la tutela instaurada por MARCO TULIO RESTREPO a la respectiva Sala de Selección para que sea allí donde se determine si se escoge o no para revisión.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.